TV consumption is making a clear migration from broadcast and classic managed IPTV platforms to over-the-top (OTT) delivery. This occurs in both live linear channels as well as with catch-up content, defined as video on demand (VOD) assets of recently aired content played out to consumers while capturing the TV audience. From a business model standpoint, early premium OTT services were based primarily on subscription VOD models (SVOD) and therefore ad-free content. Meanwhile, early online video platforms, generally defined as short-form content like YouTube, relied primarily on pre-roll advertisements. They have done so primarily within the context of dedicated applications (YouTube, Vevo, etc.), which originate the advertising and content from the same server and can coordinate the playback. Newer live linear Pay TV Lite services, supported by mix of subscription and ad supported revenues, are just taking off as a meaningful component of the Pay TV landscape. They grew nearly 50% in 2016 to US$1.1 billion and are expected to grow at a 44% annual growth rate through 2021 to represent US$6.8 billion in subscription revenues.
In the Pay TV domain and modern syndicated content, the majority of services today rely on client-side advertising insertion. In brief, the client device stops playing back the content, sends out a Video Ad Serving Template (VAST) request, gets a response, loads the asset, and then restarts playing back the content.
Client-side ad insertion puts the burden of communication and coordination on mobile devices, which have the wrong characteristics for these tasks—they are performance and memory-limited, battery-starved, and have long latencies and strained connectivity to network resources. From a more comprehensive perspective, problems with client-side ad insertion include:
These challenges are causing many broadcasters to move to a next-generation technology: server-side advertising insertion (SSAI). SSAI implementations move the complexity from every client and SDK to the server side. They improve each of the problems listed above, in brief:
Ad blocking is not a uniform problem—Digiday published data (http://digiday.com/publishers/global-state-of-ad-blocking/) showing how ad blocking is today greater on desktop devices than mobile devices, is done by men more than women, and is done by younger audiences more than older audiences. There is significant regional variation, with Poland being the highest (38%), Germany and the US with strong levels of ad blocking (~25%), lower levels in the UK (21%), and the lowest in Japan (10%). Server-side ad insertion can help overcome many of the challenges of client-side technology, simultaneously improving quality and increasing ad impressions. For instance, Elemental Technologies enabled Ooyala to implement server-side ad insertion with the Ooyala Pulse ad server for customers to improve video service monetization.
Now is the time to take a detailed look at how client-side ad insertion technology is degrading your subscriber/viewer experience and how ad blocking is impacting your service monetization. Subscriber expectations for video continue to grow, and the bar for expected video quality is slowly rising—server-side ad insertion is one tool that can help increase quality of service and improve viewer experience. Now is also a good time to prevent ad blocking as it occurs at lower levels on mobile devices than desktop devices, while mobile devices are driving an increasing amount of viewing. Moves taken today toward server-side ad insertion can help keep your video service ahead of the curve and grow, from a monetization standpoint, faster than would otherwise be possible.